dhis2-devs team mailing list archive

[Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@xxxxxxxxx>]

2009/5/26 Saptarshi Purkayastha <sunbiz@xxxxxxxxx>:
> There are few important things to consider:
>
> 1.) Person should be able to have any type of relationship with another
> person (eg. other members of the community)/user (e.g. health workers).
> Basically the associated relationship can be stored as a relationship table
> and that can be anything that the user wants to add
>
> 2.) Having multiple identifiers is a necessity of sorts for community
> setting... May be not so much in a clinical setting
>
> 3.) We can store things securely in the same database. Just when doing CRUD
> on name-based tables we do encryption/decryption. Managing it would be
> easier with different databases, but don't know if its worth the overhead.
>
> Other points about the frameworks and design that I have been wanting to say
> are better discussed during Thursday developer call.
>

Hi Saptarshi

I think the more that can be said in advance of the call the better.
Otherwise we spend 2 hours talking in circles.  I know you have some
ideas of technology stacks you have discussed before.  Would be a good
idea to lay that out a bit if possible.

Similarly there has been some talk of *possible* migration of DHIS2
towards struts 2 - at least there is a reasonably clear migration path
and I know Murod has done some work with experimental module.  Is this
something to be considered?   Lars what do you think?

Regards
Bob