dhis2-devs team mailing list archive
-
dhis2-devs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #30887
Re: Contract changes in User Controller.
Good.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Kiran Prakash <kprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> oh ok. Thanks Lars, We will look into this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kiran.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Lars Helge Øverland <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kiran,
>>
>> it could be I get this wrong, however just a suggestion: When classifying
>> the organisation units in DHIS it is useful to utilize an organisation unit
>> group set ("Org unit type") and organisation unit groups for each type.
>> This makes is possible to later do data analysis broken down on org unit
>> type, ie. org unit type will become a data dimension and appear in left
>> side menu in pivot table / visualizer apps. It is also possible to get org
>> units and group membership in lists now e.g. like this:
>>
>>
>> http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/api/organisationUnits.json?fields=id,name,organisationUnitGroups
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Lars
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Kiran Prakash <
>> kprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible to keep backward compatibility intact while making API
>>> changes?
>>>
>>> We're already seeing lot of issues on our side, and I'm sure others
>>> who're using the API will also face these problems.
>>>
>>> One more place where the API change is breaking our code is this, while
>>> querying the org hierarchy.
>>>
>>> for eg:
>>> http://localhost:8080/api/organisationUnits/d06372e4302?includeDescendants=true
>>>
>>> Would give the queried organization and all its descendents and its
>>> custom attributes etc.
>>>
>>> with the new API, we're trying to get
>>>
>>> <http://localhost:8080/api/organisationUnits/d06372e4302?fields=:all,children[:all]>
>>>
>>> http://localhost:8080/api/organisationUnits/d06372e4302?fields=:all,children[:all]
>>>
>>> the decendents of the org has been renamed to 'children', but the
>>> children does not have all the custom attributes set. We are using a custom
>>> attribute on the organization to figure the type of node in the hierarchy
>>> (eg. country, hospital, etc ) and some of our domain logic is based on this
>>> type.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are we missing something in our query? Please let us know.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Kiran.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <mortenoh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes,
>>>>
>>>> This is by design, :all merely means "give me all property on current
>>>> level". It will by default render idObjects with just idObject properties,
>>>> and Collections of idObject as a collection of idObject properties.
>>>>
>>>> I know this breaks things, but we were really not happy with the
>>>> current use of viewClasses (@JsonView), I hope it won't be too difficult to
>>>> implement.
>>>>
>>>> We do support recursive expansion of the fields properties, so you can
>>>> do ?fields=a,b,c[a,b,c[a,b]],d[:all] etc, but yes.. this requires changes
>>>> to your code (most of this is supported in 2.15, but you will to use
>>>> include= instead)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Morten
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Aravind Muralikrishnan <
>>>> aravindm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Morten,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for the quick fix!
>>>>>
>>>>> We were trying the new api and it works. We also looked at the code a
>>>>> little bit, and we saw that if we don't give any query params, we are
>>>>> defaulting it to ":all". However this retrieves fields only at the first
>>>>> level and does not retrieve fields for the nested entities.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ex: When we get user object using say */api/users/OYLGMiazHtW.json *it
>>>>> just gets the user object and does not get all the fields of the
>>>>> userCredentials object.
>>>>>
>>>>> This might break backwards compatibility of the api, as the older api
>>>>> was giving out all the fields by default including nested objects. Is this
>>>>> the expected behaviour?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Aravind
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <
>>>>> mortenoh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This should now be working in rev 15615.
>>>>>> /api/users/OYLGMiazHtW.json?fields=:all,userCredentials[:all]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please try it out and report any issues back
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Morten
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <
>>>>>> mortenoh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All our endpoint have now been switched our to using the new field
>>>>>>> filtering (similar to the old inclusion/exclusion), so the data you want is
>>>>>>> probably there, but you have to tell the system you want to have it. I do
>>>>>>> see that there is a bug in the UserCredentials class, I will fix that
>>>>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please see the documentation here:
>>>>>>> http://www.dhis2.org/doc/snapshot/en/user/html/ch30s07.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regarding the the custom serializers, we needed a bit more custom
>>>>>>> control over the output, we still use Jackson (ObjectMapper, but not
>>>>>>> data-binding) in the backend, together with xml (StAX).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Morten
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Mahendra Kariya <
>>>>>>> mahendrk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello Morten,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We're facing some issues due to some recent changes to
>>>>>>>> UserController.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The serialized 'User' json has some issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The 'usercredentials' field is now being serialized as
>>>>>>>> 'org.hisp.dhis.user.UserCredentials' and also some of the properties of
>>>>>>>> UserCredentials (like userAuthorityGroup ) is not being serialized.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One of our application is breaking due to these contract changes.
>>>>>>>> We tried fixing it, but soon got lost in the custom serialization code.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you please have a look at this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ( Also on a side note, is there any specific reason we are going
>>>>>>>> for custom serialization instead of going for standard serializers like
>>>>>>>> Jackson? )
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mahendra/Kiran
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>> Post to : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>> Post to : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Follow ups
References