dhis2-devs team mailing list archive

[Sandesh Sukumar Doolipeta <sandeshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi lars ,

     You are right. It works as expected.

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lars Helge Øverland <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi Sandesh,
>
> are you sure..? I don't think these are related. Either you do server
> validation (e-tag + lastmodified headers) or you expiry cache (expiry +
> cache control). It should not be necessary to also set cache-control,
> unless it is already set to no-cache..
>
> Lars
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Sandesh Sukumar Doolipeta <
> sandeshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Morten ,
>>
>>       Apologies for the delayed response. From the change you have made ,
>> we are getting the E-Tag header. However , since the response headers do
>> not contain the "Cache-control" header , the browser depends on the client
>> to set the "If-none-match" header. In which case , the client has to store
>> the previous E-Tag value and send the  "If-none-match" header.
>>
>>     In the change that we had made , along with the "E-Tag" header , we
>> were also sending the "Cache-control: max-age=1" header. In this case , the
>> browser itself takes the responsibility of setting the "If-none-match"
>> header , instead of depending on the client.
>>
>>    Is it possible to send the "Cache-control: max-age=1" header along
>> with the E-Tag header ?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Lars Helge Øverland <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Good. I think this will work equally well.
>>>
>>> Lars
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Sandesh Doolipeta**Application Developer*
>> Emailsandeshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Telephone9686062727
>> [image: ThoughtWorks] <http://www.thoughtworks.com/>
>>
>
>


-- 
*Sandesh Doolipeta**Application Developer*
Emailsandeshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Telephone9686062727
[image: ThoughtWorks] <http://www.thoughtworks.com/>