dhis2-devs team mailing list archive
-
dhis2-devs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #37480
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
HI Shantala,
I will take a look at it couple days later. I will inform you if I find out
the issue.
...........................................
Best regards,
Tran Chau
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Shantala Raman <sraman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hi Tran,
>
> Here <https://www.dropbox.com/s/zywgr1sys7crx4k/dhis2_db.dump?dl=0> is
> the link to the DB dump of DHIS in dropbox where we have setup the data
> needed to replicate the defect. We have associated the *Cholera CTC*
> program under the organization hierarchy, MSF->OCP->A new country->A new
> project->New Hospital->Cholera->Origin 1. The program is of type *Single
> event without registration*.
>
> Steps to reproduce the defect:
>
> 1. In event capture, register an event for the *Cholera CTC* program
> under the *Origin 1* org unit.
> 2. Preview the manual aggregation results for *Geographic Origin* data
> set for *Origin 1* org unit for the week of the *Incident date* and
> save all values.
> 3. In data entry, you will see that the value of the *Number of
> Patients (Cholera CTC) *data element for the *Geographic Origin* data
> set for the week of the *Incident date* is 1.
> 4. In event capture, remove the event for the *Cholera CTC* program
> under the *Origin 1* org unit.
> 5. Preview the manual aggregation results for *Geographic Origin* data
> set for *Origin 1* org unit for the week of the *Incident date*. This
> won't return any changes to be updated while the expected behavior is that
> preview shows that the value for the *Number of Patients (Cholera CTC)*
> data element will change from 1 to 0. Save all values.
> 6. In data entry, you will see the value of the *Number of Patients
> (Cholera CTC)* data element remains as 1 for the *Geographic Origin*
> data set for the week while the expected behavior is that the value of the *Number
> of Patients (Cholera CTC)* data element is 0.
>
> Thanks,
> Shantala
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Shantala Raman <sraman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tran,
>>
>> We are on 2.19 rev 19092. We are not using SQL queries for generating
>> summary data values. We are using the aggregation query builder to setup
>> the queries. Could you explain how the SQL query is linked to aggregation
>> query builder?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shantala
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Tran Chau (HISP Vietnam) <
>> tran.hispvietnam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Shantala,
>>>
>>> The first, please make sure if the snapshots are from 2.19 version, R
>>> 19075 ? It looks like old version.
>>>
>>>
>>> I couldn't create an example on dev server ( apps.dhis2.org/dev )
>>> because the internet is still slow here. I cannot login the dev server to
>>> create an example.
>>>
>>> I am sending the SQL statement which I used to generate the data values
>>> from aggregate query formulas.
>>>
>>> Can you change the IDs in the SQL statement below according to one of
>>> your formula and see if it is generated "NULL" value records or not (
>>> these NULL values will be displayed/saved as "0" values in Manual Aggregate
>>> )
>>>
>>>
>>> SELECT '55' as dataelementid, '16' as categoryoptioncomboid,
>>> '16' as attributeoptioncomboid, ou.organisationunitid as sourceid,
>>> '1234' as periodid,'aggregated_from_tracker' as storedby,
>>> '201505' as periodIsoDate,'Agg DE 1' as dataelementname,
>>> '(default)' as categoryoptioncomboname, ou.name as
>>> organisationunitname,
>>> ( select count(psi.programinstanceid) as value FROM programinstance as
>>> pi
>>> INNER JOIN programstageinstance psi ON
>>> pi.programinstanceid=psi.programinstanceid
>>> WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM trackedentitydatavalue _pdv
>>> inner join programstageinstance _psi ON
>>> _pdv.programstageinstanceid=_psi.programstageinstanceid
>>> JOIN programinstance _pi ON _pi.programinstanceid=_psi.programinstanceid
>>> WHERE psi.programstageinstanceid=_pdv.programstageinstanceid
>>> AND _pdv.dataelementid=53 AND _psi.organisationunitid in (50, 51, 52)
>>>
>>> AND _pi.programid = 60 AND _psi.executionDate>='2015-05-01'
>>> AND _psi.executionDate <= '2015-05-31'
>>> AND _psi.programstageid = 63 AND _pdv.value is not null )
>>> and psi.organisationunitid=ou.organisationunitid
>>>
>>> GROUP BY ou.organisationunitid ) from organisationunit ou where
>>> ou.organisationunitid in ( 50, 51, 52 )
>>>
>>>
>>> ...............................
>>> Best regards
>>> Tran Chau
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Tran Chau (HISP Vietnam) <
>>> tran.hispvietnam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Shantala,
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure if the snapshots are from 2.19 version, R 19075 ?
>>>> It looks like old version.
>>>>
>>>> ...................
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Tran Chau
>>>> Hi Tran,
>>>>
>>>> We are still seeing issues with the aggregation. We followed the below
>>>> steps -
>>>>
>>>> - Created a data element with *Store zero data values* property set
>>>> to Yes
>>>> - Created an aggregation query for the data element
>>>> - Created 3 events for the program of type* single event without
>>>> registration* - 2 events under orgunit 1 (origin 1) and 1 event
>>>> under orgunit 2 (origin 2)
>>>> - Ran manual aggregation for both org units
>>>> - Deleted the event under org unit 2 (origin 2)
>>>> - Ran manual aggregation for both org units
>>>>
>>>> We observe that the data entry screen for org unit 2 (origin 2) still
>>>> has the number of events as 1.
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the screenshots for the various steps. Please let
>>>> us know if you need any other information.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shantala & Shashank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Tran Chau (HISP Vietnam) <
>>>> tran.hispvietnam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> HI Simata,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, this bug is fixed on 19075, trunk version.
>>>>>
>>>>> I created an example on dev server ( https://apps.dhis2.org/dev/ )
>>>>> for testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sending snapshot about the test step by step on dev server here.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 1 - Create a data element and an aggregate query builder formula*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 1.1* - Create a data element with* '**Store zero data values' *property as
>>>>> '*Yes' ( see snapshot [1.1] ). And add it into a dataset.*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 1.2* - Defined an aggregate query builder formula* ( see
>>>>> snapshot [1.2] )*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 2 - Generate data values*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 2.1* - Create a new person and an event in April 2015. Fill a
>>>>> data value for data element which I used in Step 1.2 ( see snapshot [
>>>>> *2.1*] )
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 2.2 *- Run Aggregate Manual ( see snapshot [*2.2*] )
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 2.3 *- Result after clicking "Preview" button ( see snapshot [
>>>>> *2.3*] )
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 2.4* - Data values imported in the data set ( see snapshot [
>>>>> *2.4*] , [*2.5*] )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 3 - Modified data value of event in Step 2.1 and see the result
>>>>> after aggregate*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 3.1* - Remove the data which was filled in Step* 2.1* ( see
>>>>> snapshot [*3.1*] )
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 32 *- Run Aggregate Manual ( see snapshot [*3.2*] )
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 3.3 *- Result after clicking "*Preview*" button ( see snapshot [
>>>>> *3.3*] )
>>>>>
>>>>> *Step 3.4* - Data values imported in the data set ( see snapshot [
>>>>> *3.4*] , [*3.5*] ).
>>>>>
>>>>> We can see the data value in April ( snapshot [*3.4*] ) is 0 now )
>>>>>
>>>>> .....................................................................
>>>>>
>>>>> If you got different result, send me the images and description like
>>>>> these.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will take a look at it.
>>>>>
>>>>> .............................................................
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Tran Chau.
>>>>> On May 7, 2015 1:03 PM, "Simanta Jyoti Handique" <
>>>>> shandique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We were wondering if this bug has been fixed as part of rev #19075.
>>>>>> We are on rev #19097 and are still facing this issue
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Simanta
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Tran Chau (HISP Vietnam) <
>>>>>> tran.hispvietnam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HI Simanta and others,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The issue is in Manual Aggregate, the "0" values are not
>>>>>>> displayed/saved.
>>>>>>> I am working on it to display and save "0" values in Manual
>>>>>>> Aggregate functionality.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for reporting this bug.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ..........................................
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Tran Chau
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Simanta Jyoti Handique <
>>>>>>> shandique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi, thanks for the response. The data elements were already
>>>>>>>> configured to store zero data values.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This may be another symptom to the problem: If I run the
>>>>>>>> aggregation manually and preview the data that will be saved, there are no
>>>>>>>> results with 0 values
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Simanta
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Adebusoye Anifalaje <
>>>>>>>> busoye@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just re read your question. My mistake. To overwrite values with
>>>>>>>>> 0, you have to choose to store zero data values when creating the
>>>>>>>>> aggregate data element.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, April 27, 2015, Adebusoye Anifalaje <busoye@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Simanta,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You should try changing the Operator to Number of tracked
>>>>>>>>>> entities. Visits are technically for program stages and since you are not
>>>>>>>>>> registering programs then you can't have visits.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Try tracked entities and let's know whether it worked.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Busoye
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, April 27, 2015, Simanta Jyoti Handique <
>>>>>>>>>> shandique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We have set up an aggregation query with the following details:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Name: Number of Patients (Measles Outbreak)
>>>>>>>>>>> Operator: Number of Visits
>>>>>>>>>>> Data set: Geographic Origin
>>>>>>>>>>> Data Element: Number of Patients (Measles Outbreak) - Geographic
>>>>>>>>>>> Origin (Number)
>>>>>>>>>>> Condition: [Measles Outbreak.Measles Outbreak stage.Date of
>>>>>>>>>>> admission] is not null
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Measles Outbreak" is a Single Event without Registration type
>>>>>>>>>>> program. "Date of admission" is a Data Element of type Date
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We register an event, run the aggregation query and the "Number
>>>>>>>>>>> of Patients (Measles Outbreak) - Geographic Origin (Number)" data element
>>>>>>>>>>> is correctly populated with the count of the number of patients. We delete
>>>>>>>>>>> the event and re-run the query. The data element for the number of patients
>>>>>>>>>>> does not get updated with the value 0.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is this a defect with the Aggregation Query feature or is there
>>>>>>>>>>> something wrong with the formula we're using?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Simanta
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>> Post to : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Follow ups
References
-
Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Simanta Jyoti Handique, 2015-04-27
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Adebusoye Anifalaje, 2015-04-27
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Adebusoye Anifalaje, 2015-04-27
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Simanta Jyoti Handique, 2015-04-27
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Tran Chau (HISP Vietnam), 2015-04-28
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Simanta Jyoti Handique, 2015-05-07
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Tran Chau (HISP Vietnam), 2015-05-08
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Shantala Raman, 2015-05-11
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Tran Chau (HISP Vietnam), 2015-05-11
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Tran Chau (HISP Vietnam), 2015-05-11
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Shantala Raman, 2015-05-12
-
Re: Defect with the Aggregation Query feature?
From: Shantala Raman, 2015-05-18