dhis2-devs team mailing list archive
-
dhis2-devs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #38584
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
Oh, and please make sure that you update the UIDs of these tables "default"
also. Since you might want to to those on import also. So delete the
duplicate default in those tables, but update the remaining default with
the duplicate uid (hope that makes sense).
--
Morten
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <mortenoh@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Yeah, I think that should be ok, just make sure you have a backup ;-) When
> it creates the default COC, it will also setup the tables around it,
> probably you will see duplicate "default" names in those tables also.
>
> --
> Morten
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Mritunjay Dubey <
> mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hey Mortan,
>>
>> Thanx for your quick response. I tried deleting it from the table. But If
>> I see it has FK references to following table.
>>
>> *categorycombos_optioncombos*
>>
>> *categoryoptioncombos_categoryoptions*
>>
>> *expressionoptioncombo*
>>
>> So before deleting that category-option-combo I need to delete references
>> from all these tables.
>>
>> Is this the way I should do it ?
>> Please let me know.
>>
>> Thank you
>> Mritunjay
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <mortenoh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> You probably want to delete the "default" that was created during
>>> import, I assume no FK is attached to it. After you have done this, you
>>> should be able to change the UID of the other "default" COC to "
>>> dCWAvZ8hcrs".
>>>
>>> This is the way we have solved it a few places (before it was fixed in
>>> the code).
>>>
>>> --
>>> Morten
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Mritunjay Dubey <
>>> mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> So as suggested I tried to update the "default" category-option-combo
>>>> UID to the UID of source instance. But it didn't work.
>>>>
>>>> The reason was I already have a category-option-combo with same UID
>>>> which also has name "default". I think which came after import. So now it
>>>> has two "default" category-option-combos, and on UI it's showing the one
>>>> which got generated automatically, not the one which I imported.
>>>>
>>>> I'll just show the workaround
>>>>
>>>> *Selected** details of **categoryoptioncombos which have name *
>>>> *“default” *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> select * from categoryoptioncombo where categoryoptioncomboid in
>>>>
>>>> (select categoryoptioncomboid from categorycombos_optioncombos where categorycomboid =
>>>>
>>>> (select categorycomboid from categorycombo where name='default'));
>>>>
>>>> *It gave me 2 results*
>>>>
>>>> categoryoptioncomboid | uid | code |
>>>> created | lastupdated
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------+-------------+------+-------------------------+-------------------------
>>>> 16 | SVxKSIBjYFR |
>>>> | 2015-07-15 05:38:33.869 | 2015-07-15 05:38:33.869
>>>> 29614 | dCWAvZ8hcrs |
>>>> | 2012-02-11 11:27:56 | 2015-07-15 05:43:16.587
>>>>
>>>> *First one which is created in destination instance automatically, and
>>>> second one which is imported. *
>>>>
>>>> *Now I tried changing the UID*
>>>>
>>>> update categoryoptioncombo set uid =
>>>> 'dCWAvZ8hcrs' where categoryoptioncomboid = 16;
>>>>
>>>> It failed with an error saying bellow
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique
>>>> constraint "categoryoptioncombo_uid_key"
>>>> DETAIL: Key (uid)=(dCWAvZ8hcrs) already
>>>> exists.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please suggest, what should be workaround.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Mritunjay
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Knut Staring <knutst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I meant 2.19
>>>>> On Jul 14, 2015 2:47 PM, "Mritunjay Dubey" <mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Knut,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Upgrade means, Do I need to upgrade to 2.19, or somehow I can get a
>>>>>> new revision of 2.16 only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Knut Staring <knutst@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has been fixed. Just upgrade.
>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2015 2:33 PM, "Mritunjay Dubey" <
>>>>>>> mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes please fix it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because it's hard to know the "default" category-combo-option UID,
>>>>>>>> If you don't have database access to source instance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or If there is a way to get "default" category-combo-option
>>>>>>>> UID please let me know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <
>>>>>>>> mortenoh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I'm pretty sure this bug is still present in 2.16. Please
>>>>>>>>> try to fix it as Jason suggested..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Morten
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Alex Tumwesigye <
>>>>>>>>> atumwesigye@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear Dubey,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jason is right.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have had trouble before with a similar issue doing imports.
>>>>>>>>>> One thing I keep in mind when importing to a new instance
>>>>>>>>>> (without using a database dump) is to overwrite the "default"
>>>>>>>>>> category option combo with the one I am carrying from the existing data.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To be safe, first import "categoryOptionCombos with depedencies"
>>>>>>>>>> and then import the rest.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <
>>>>>>>>>> mortenoh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Could you also please provide your DHIS 2 version and build rev?
>>>>>>>>>>> we should have fixed this issue 1-2 months ago (or at least a similar issue)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Morten
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Jason Pickering <
>>>>>>>>>>> jason.p.pickering@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In this case, you should probably alter the "default" category
>>>>>>>>>>>> option combo on the destination server to match that on the source server,
>>>>>>>>>>>> if that is possible for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Something like
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> UPDATE categoryoptioncombo set uid = 'XXXXXXXXX' where
>>>>>>>>>>>> categoryoptioncomboid = (SELECT categoryoptioncomboid from
>>>>>>>>>>>> _categoryoptioncomboname where categoryoptioncomboname = '(default)');
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> should work, where XXXXXXX is the uid of the source server.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Clear your server cache and rebuild all the resource tables,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and you should be good to go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Mritunjay Dubey <
>>>>>>>>>>>> mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Jason,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think it's "default" category option combo, but I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure about it. I can see in UI of dataset, it shows as "default" and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> date-created for category option combo is the date when I set-up the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So If it's a "default" *category-option-combo, *what should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do to sync it between instances ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mritunjay Dubey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Jason Pickering <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jason.p.pickering@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this happen to be the "default" category option combo?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If so, it will be different between different instances of the database,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you will thus need to sync this one manually between your instances.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Mritunjay Dubey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Mritunjay Dubey <mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:58 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] Deployable war for previous builds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Lars Helge Øverland <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just adding to that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had selected every metadata other than *Validation-criteria
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & Report Table.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while importing I could see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Importing 404 CategoryOptionCombos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it should not be re-generated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Mritunjay Dubey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Lars,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For us, the second explanation seems relevant. If I got to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the source instance and pick a *category option combo*, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destination instance for same *category option combo *the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UID is different.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For E.G.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I pick the dataset *Quarterly COIA Plus Dataset *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In source instance, textbox in first row has id
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *vIIFdYmaLk7-dCWAvZ8hcrs-val*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In destination instance, textbox in first row has id
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *vIIFdYmaLk7-s1oqQs4sQhc-val*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which I think because *category option combo UID *is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any clues what could be the reason for this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mritunjay Dubey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Lars Helge Øverland <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> larshelge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another explanation is that the category option combos for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some reason were not part of the exchange file, and was later re-generated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the destination system. This will give different UIDs. Let me know..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Lars Helge Øverland <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> larshelge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mritunjay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you referring the the internal database identifiers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or the UIDs (stable identifiers) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The UIDs will (should) not change and this has nothing to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do with the build.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The database ids will likely change when you do an export
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> followed by an import.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When writing reports you should base it on the UIDs just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for this reason. I am guessing you relied on the database identifiers which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then changed during import-export.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lars
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Mritunjay Dubey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mritunjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey team,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are setting up a new instance of DHIS. We had got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already an instance running. So we exported metadata from there and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imported in new one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But If we see, we are getting a difference between few *IDs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (*e.g.- category-option IDs) for few reports.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What I think because we have used the same metadata it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be same in both.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW we have different *Build Revision *in both
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instances. So if there is a way to get the *artifacts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of previous builds*, it might solve the problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kindly let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mritunjay Dubey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Post to : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lars Helge Øverland
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lead developer, DHIS 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> University of Oslo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skype: larshelgeoverland
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.dhis2.org <https://www.dhis2.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lars Helge Øverland
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lead developer, DHIS 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> University of Oslo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skype: larshelgeoverland
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.dhis2.org <https://www.dhis2.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Post to : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jason P. Pickering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: jason.p.pickering@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tel:+46764147049
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jason P. Pickering
>>>>>>>>>>>> email: jason.p.pickering@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> tel:+46764147049
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>>>>>> Post to : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>>>>> Post to : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Alex Tumwesigye
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Technical Advisor - DHIS2 (Consultant),
>>>>>>>>>> Ministry of Health/AFENET
>>>>>>>>>> Kampala
>>>>>>>>>> Uganda
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IT Consultant - BarefootPower Uganda Ltd, SmartSolar, Kenya
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IT Specialist (Servers, Networks and Security, Health Information
>>>>>>>>>> Systems - DHIS2 ) & Solar Consultant
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +256 774149 775, + 256 759 800161
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "I don't want to be anything other than what I have been - one
>>>>>>>>>> tree hill "
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>> Post to : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
References
-
Deployable war for previous builds
From: Mritunjay Dubey, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Lars Helge Øverland, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Lars Helge Øverland, 2015-07-14
-
Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Mritunjay Dubey, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Jason Pickering, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Mritunjay Dubey, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Jason Pickering, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Morten Olav Hansen, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Alex Tumwesigye, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Morten Olav Hansen, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Mritunjay Dubey, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Knut Staring, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Mritunjay Dubey, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Knut Staring, 2015-07-14
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Mritunjay Dubey, 2015-07-15
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Morten Olav Hansen, 2015-07-15
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Mritunjay Dubey, 2015-07-15
-
Re: Fwd: Deployable war for previous builds
From: Morten Olav Hansen, 2015-07-15