dhis2-users team mailing list archive

["Wilson,Randy" <rwilson@xxxxxxx>]

This is an interesting issue to Rwanda as well - we have similar requirements.

Just a quick thought, would it not be possible to use the DHIS-2 user's orgunit access (as assigned when setting up the User by orgunit) to do this filtering?  How exactly could that be accessed in a view or report table?

Randy Wilson

From: dhis2-users-bounces+rwilson=msh.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dhis2-users-bounces+rwilson=msh.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jason Pickering
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:26 AM
To: Ola Hodne Titlestad
Cc: dhis2-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-users] Need some help

This problem is somehow related to an issue I was discussing with Bob,namely that it would be useful to have a filter in  place for certain user to only be able to be allowed to download the data for orgunits for which they have entered. I do not really know exactly Stephen's issue, but I suspect it may be a similar requirement to what we have in Nigeria, namely that users should be allowed to get their own aggregate data but not the aggregate data of others. So, if IRC has entered data, a filter should be put in place to retrieve their data from the orgunits assigned to this particular user, and not inherit any other orgunits which have they have not been explicitly assigned.


2012/2/14 Ola Hodne Titlestad <olati@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:olati@xxxxxxxxxx>>

If it is only 10 facilities you need I would go with the mydatamart approach and select 1 facility at a time and download their data into the same local datamart and then create a pivot table on top of that. A bit cumbersome, but this requires no extra query on the server side.
More long term we are planning filters in mydatamart to more easily download subsets of facilities or data elements. Right now you can download all data for 1 facilty or for all facilities in an area(parent,grandparent etc).

Ola
On Feb 14, 2012 9:13 PM, "Lars Helge Øverland" <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:larshelge@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: