documentation-packages team mailing list archive

[Michael Terry <michael.terry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I mean, it's fine to put this back if we need it.  It used to be in
main, it's just fonts, etc.

But for the same reasons that we downgraded it (has a replacement), it
would still be nice to drop it again in the future.  Is there another
way to solve bug 1625734 than going back to fonts-android?

Is it possible to split fonts-noto-cjk into smaller chunks for example?

But for yakkety sure, let's promote this again.

** Changed in: fonts-android (Ubuntu)
       Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-android in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626245

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

Status in fonts-android package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ghostscript package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Please include the fonts-android package in Ubuntu's component main.

  fonts-android includes the fonts-droid-fallback binary, and as a
  result of the discussion at bug 1625734, the server team wants that
  libgs9-common, which currently recommends fonts-noto-cjk, is changed
  to instead recommend fonts-droid-fallback.

  fonts-android is a Debian package and included in Debian's component
  main. It was included in Ubuntu's component main between trusty and
  wily.

  Bugs:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=fonts-android

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android

  I have read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuMainInclusionRequirements,
  and haven't found any issues that would prevent the proposed main
  inclusion.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1626245/+subscriptions