documentation-packages team mailing list archive

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson <1626245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

@Joshua: Assuming that the server team wants to keep the ISO size CD
compatible also in 17.04, your calculation indicates that you would need
to use an alternative package for Chinese fonts even if we would do the
split I mentioned in comment #4.

So I would say that the ball is in your court now. I see no other reason
to spend time on a split of fonts-noto-cjk, and won't take any
initiative doing so unless it actually makes things better.

Please let me know.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-android in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626245

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

Status in fonts-android package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ghostscript package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Please include the fonts-android package in Ubuntu's component main.

  fonts-android includes the fonts-droid-fallback binary, and as a
  result of the discussion at bug 1625734, the server team wants that
  libgs9-common, which currently recommends fonts-noto-cjk, is changed
  to instead recommend fonts-droid-fallback.

  fonts-android is a Debian package and included in Debian's component
  main. It was included in Ubuntu's component main between trusty and
  wily.

  Bugs:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=fonts-android

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android

  I have read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuMainInclusionRequirements,
  and haven't found any issues that would prevent the proposed main
  inclusion.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1626245/+subscriptions