dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00611
Re: Re: [PETSC #13198] Re: trouble with FeNiCS
I'm a little confused...
Matt says:
This flag says:
1) You configured with --with-clanguage=C++ so that the C++
compiler is used to compile the libraries.
Barry says:
If PETSc is configured to compile with the C++ compiler
--with-clanguage=c++ then this flag should NOT be used
Which is it?
Which is the default? If I just do
./config/configure.py
make BOPT=g_c++
make BOPT=O_c++
then I should not need this flag, right?
If someone needs it, that means he (Andy) did something different when
compiling PETSc?
/Anders
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:49:37PM -0500, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> This flag says:
>
> 1) You configured with --with-clanguage=C++ so that the C++ compiler is used to
> compile the libraries.
>
> 2) The PETSc symbols are NOT mangled when using PETSC_USE_EXTERN_CXX so C code
> can call these symbols.
>
> This is not are normal mode. We believe if you want to compile with C++, then you
> want mangled symbols.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> > I think we added a
> >
> > PETSC_CFLAGS="$PETSC_CFLAGS -DPETSC_USE_EXTERN_CXX"
> >
> > just below the definition of PETSC_CFLAGS in configure.ac. You need
> > to add this, then run scripts/preconfigure and then ./configure again.
> >
> > We get PETSC_CFLAGS by
> >
> > PETSC_CFLAGS=`make -s -C $PETSC_DIR getincludedirs PETSC_DIR=$PETSC_DIR BOPT=$BOPT`
> >
> > which I think should be enough. I don't know why the extra
> > -DPETSC_USE_EXTERN_CXX helps on some systems or why it's not included
> > with getincludedirs.
> >
> > /Anders
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:38:05PM -0500, Andy Ray Terrel wrote:
> >> Sorry to bother you again. But when I tried to run some things with
> >> dolfin I just got a PETSc Error. So I tried to rebuild but remembered
> >> that when I built the first time I had to add some linker to PETSc
> >> somewhere. Well I have forgotten what it was we added to get PETSc to
> >> link. Do you remember?
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> Anders Logg wrote:
> >>
> >> >You need to do A and B separately, as two different forms in two
> >> >different files.
> >> >
> >> >In the first file, do something like
> >> >
> >> > vector = FiniteElement("Vector Lagrange", "triangle", 1)
> >> >
> >> > v = BasisFunction(vector)
> >> > u = BasisFunction(vector)
> >> >
> >> > a = v.dx(i)*u.dx(i)*dx
> >> >
> >> >In the second file, do something like
> >> >
> >> > vector = FiniteElement("Vector Lagrange", "triangle", 1)
> >> > scalar = FiniteElement("Lagrange", "triangle", 1)
> >> >
> >> > q = BasisFunction(scalar)
> >> > u = BasisFunction(vector)
> >> >
> >> > a = q*u[i].dx(i)*dx
> >> >
> >> >Compile each form and then assemble separately in DOLFIN to get A and B.
> >> >You can then either combine A and B to get the full matrix, or you can
> >> >do fixed-point iteration, or you can create something called a
> >> >"VirtualMatrix" in DOLFIN which implements the matrix-vector product
> >> >for the full matrix in terms of A and B.
> >> >
> >> >Hope this helps. Ask me again when you need more help.
> >> >
> >> >/Anders
> >> >
> >> >On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:48:43AM -0500, Andy Terrel wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>Hey Anders,
> >> >>
> >> >>I am having some trouble figuring out how to write some stokes equations
> >> >>up for my project. So I have the forms:
> >> >>
> >> >>a = v.dx(j) *u.dy(j)
> >> >>b= q*r*dx
> >> >>
> >> >>and I want to construct the matrix C s.t.
> >> >> [ A B^t ]
> >> >>C=[ B 0 ]
> >> >>
> >> >>This is so I can call some mixed methods for the solving of the problem
> >> >>to get the benchmarking results.
> >> >>
> >> >>If you have time can you help me?
> >> >>
> >> >>Andy
> >> >>
> >> >>PS This is to solve (grad(u), grad(v)) - (p, div(v)) = 0,
> >> >> (div(u), w) = 0.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Anders Logg
Research Assistant Professor
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
http://www.tti-c.org/logg/
Follow ups
References