| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:15:44AM -0500, Anders Logg wrote: .., > > One problem we need to solve is that SWIG doesn't support nested > > classes. Perhaps we can come up with an alternative? I don't think > > they're crucial for us. > > You mean don't use nested classes in DOLFIN? > > Can we still have private nested classes that are not exposed in the > interface? Hm, I didn't consider that. This may not be an issue then, since I don't think we use nested classes in the public interface (as far as I know). I'll have to test this, but my guess is that the answer is yes to your question. Johan
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |