dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01314
Re: [PETSC #13881] Re: nls: [...]
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Anders Logg wrote:
> But it seems strange that the version number is still 2.3.0 if it is
> actually different from the original 2.3.0. Why not change the version
> number to avoid confusion?
We do update the patch level [stored in petsc/include/petscversion.h]
The reason for the current approach [update the release tarfile with
patches] is:
- when doing a fresh install very few people appear to download
[tarfile+patchfile]
- tarfile + patchfile_21 + patchfile_32 creates some errors/fuzz
[because of already applied patches] - and users don't know for sure
if these patch-errors can be ignored.
- patchfile for Buildsytem component would be a differet file - and
would need to applied differently
- Its easier for us to re-generate the tarfile then create a patchfile
Maybe for the next releae I'll see if I can also encode 'patchlevel'
in the tarfile-name & dirname [petsc-2.3.1-11.tar.gz,
PETSC_DIR=petsc-2.3.1-11]
Satish
Follow ups
References