dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think the current design is ok. I have a few more things to add to
the mesh library and then I think the assembly should come alive
again.

/Anders


On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:54:52PM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> Sure, no problem. Also, if you can come up with a neater or unified
> implementation, go for it.
> 
> Garth
> 
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > Can we rename it applyResidualBC()? So it's named the same as the
> > other applyBC functions. It's not really assembly since we don't
> > compute any integrals.
> > 
> > /Anders
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:44:05AM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> >> Garth, do we really need assembleResidualBC() in FEM?
> >>
> >> I looks to me that
> >>
> >>   assembleResidualBC(A, b, x, ...);
> >>
> >> does the same thing as
> >>
> >>   applyBC(A, b, ...);
> >>   b -= x;
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> /Anders
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> >> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev