dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Let me add a few items:

 - "Parallelization" of the mesh

 - Finish UFC specification 1.0

 - Move FFC to UFC

 - New build system

 - BDM, RT elements in FFC

 - DG in FFC (jump terms etc)

 - Design and implement UFL

 - Move FFC to UFL and integrate UFL in DOLFIN/PyDOLFIN

/Anders


On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 03:49:26PM +0100, Johan Hoffman wrote:
> I agree with Johan; Garth was a top host! I had a great time, and I got
> back to Sweden without having been run over!
> 
> Some things that came up, which we should pursue in one way or another:
> 
> * Dolfin: surface integration (boundary + internal for discontinuous
> Galerkin etc.)
> * Dolfin mesh: hierarchical vs single mesh mode (geometric vs algebraic
> multigrid): support both.
> * Dolfin mesh: refinement/coarsening: reimplementation of broken
> Bey-algorihtm, test of "Matt-algorithm", test of simple split/collapse
> algorithms + smoothing/flipping.
> * DOLFIN: Full adaptive Navier-Stokes solver to be implemented (today
> primal solver + broken mesh refinement in place)
> * DOLFIN: Compressible flow module
> * Dolfin: ALE + free surface modules
> * Dolfin/FFC: automatic generation of error estimate/mesh indicators
> * Dolfin build system: Scons or Cmake...
> * Dolfin/FFC bc: assembly of strong bc directly in FFC (together with weak
> implementation)
> * dolfin-dev + dolfin-stable
> * Dolfin license: there seems to be an agreement on GPL -> LGPL
> 
> /Johan
> 
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The FEniCS'06 workshop was very successful: many interesting
> > discussions came up, problems were overcome and new plans were made. I
> > also had a good time personally, and it seemed like everyone else did
> > as well.
> >
> > I realize organizing a good conference is often unappreciated work.
> > But I think most people are aware that Garth provided the initial
> > conditions for the conference, so to speak, and had a hand in
> > essentially everything that happened. So in this case it's much
> > appreciated work, which I hope we'll be able to repay in kind in the
> > future.
> >
> > Garth mentioned at the end that it would be good to make a concrete
> > plan of all the things that came up. I think this is a good idea, and
> > it would be good if people could write down and post their plans while
> > it's still fresh.
> >
> >   Johan
> > _______________________________________________
> > FEniCS-dev mailing list
> > FEniCS-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-dev
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FEniCS-dev mailing list
> FEniCS-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-dev