/Anders
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:13:55PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
I just started this morning. I have the mesh partitioned (using METIS),
and a MeshFunction contains the partition number for each cell. I plan
initially to let each processor have a copy of the entire mesh and just
assemble its partition. Distributing the mesh will come later.
Garth
Anders Logg wrote:
Excellent! I have an MSc student starting after Christmas to work on
parallelization of the mesh data structures, including partitioning.
We should try to coordinate the effort.
/Anders
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:02:25PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
OK. I'm working on parallel assembly now, so I'll take a look at the
degree of freedom numbering when I get to assembling vector-valued problems.
I'll check in the beginnings of parallel assembly after the new release
is made.
Garth
Johan Hoffman wrote:
Sounds good. This is the natural way I think.
/Johan
Should we consider changing the degree of freedom numbering such that
degrees of freedom at a node are located next to each other in the
matrix/vector? This will be needed for parallel assembly. It may also
speed up the assembly of sparse matrices by allowing blocks to be
assembled.
Garth
_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev