Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Johan Hoffman wrote:
About the global dof numbering for the different components in a function defined by a mixed element: I get the impression that we use a different ordering for the mixed dofs than for the dofs of a regular vector valued function?
I don't think so. For both mixed and vector elements, dofs at the same node do not lie next to each other in the dof mapping.
It will be possible to choose the dof ordering soon when the new assembly is up and running. There is already a new class DofMap which will handle this.
Garth
I guess the natural way is to order the global dofs such that all components for a given node (e.g. a vertex for Lagrange elements) lies together, which I think gives the better block structure? It appears that the mixed dofs are ordered differently? Maybe I'm wrong? But if not, we should take care of this as soon as possible, since it is very confusing. /Johan _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |