dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06218
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:15:46PM +0100, cosby@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:06:43AM +0100, Kristen Kaasbjerg wrote:
> >> Anders Logg wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:50:23PM +0100, cosby@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:49:09PM +0100, Shilpa Khatri wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> We (Dag and I) are doing this because we would like to have Dolfin
> >> >>>>> solve
> >> >>>>> the
> >> >>>>> Stokes/Navier-Stokes equations as one part of a timestep in our
> >> code
> >> >>>>> where we
> >> >>>>> are moving interfaces that are defined as a random set of points
> >> in the
> >> >>>>> domain.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>> Shilpa
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>> Then I suggest first finding out which cells those points lie in,
> >> then
> >> >>>> then for each cell with a point get the expansion coefficients
> >> within
> >> >>>> that cell, then multiply those coefficients with the values of the
> >> >>>> basis functions at the points.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The basis functions are available from the ufc::finite_element.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We can implement a suitable interface for this at some point but
> >> >>>> until then, you can do it manually.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> Sounds good. Is the GTS_Interface still in place for searching?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> /Dag
> >> >>>
> >> >> I'm a little lost here. How is the ufc module used to get hold
> >> >> of the basis functions ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Kristen
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > You need to get hold of a ufc::finite_element and then call
> >> > evaluate_basis_function (see UFC manual). If you have a ufc::form,
> >> > then you can create a ufc::finite_element by calling
> >> > create_finite_element. If you have a dolfin::Form, then first get the
> >> > ufc::form by calling form().
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Ok, so this is doable via the python interface ?
> >> In case yes, where is the dolfin::Form then hidden ?
> >>
> >> Kristen
> >
> > Yes, you can use it from the Python interface by calling the JIT
> > compiler:
> >
> > (compiled_form, compiled_module, form_data) = jit(a)
> >
> > You can then call compiled_form.create_finite_element(i) etc
> > since this will be a Python wrapper for a ufc::form.
> >
> > BUT: If you are using the Python interface, then everything is already
> > available through the Python interface, so if you have a
> > FiniteElement, you can tabulate it's values at any point by calling
> > element.tabulate(). Note that this gives you values on the reference
> > element so you need to map the values to the physical element.
> >
> > Another comment is that things like this are better (more efficiently)
> > implemented as C++ components in DOLFIN and then wrapped back to
> > Python for general use.
>
> Yes, I know. I only have to evaluate the potential at very few points
> (< 100) though, so this wont be too expensive.
> What about the expansion coefficients - there must be a set for each
> cell ?
You mean getting hold of the expansion coefficients so you can
multiply them with the basis functions? These are in the Vector of
degrees of freedom that each Function has:
x = u.vector()
Then you need to get hold of the local-to-global mapping (which values
in this vector that are the coefficients on any given element).
The easiest way to do this is to let DOLFIN handle it by calling
u.interpolate() to get the coefficients on a given cell.
--
Anders
Follow ups
References
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Dag Lindbo, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Shilpa Khatri, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Dag Lindbo, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: cosby, 2008-02-13
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-14
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Kristen Kaasbjerg, 2008-02-14
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: Anders Logg, 2008-02-14
-
Re: Evaluating the FEM solution at an arbitrary point
From: cosby, 2008-02-14