← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: SCOTCH broken?

 

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:35:32PM +0100, johannr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 05:00:22PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >
> >> johannr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 Anders Logg wrote:
> >> >> It looks like the SCOTCH test was modified to not include common.h
> >> >> (as I suggested). But as pointed out by Johannes, common.h is needed
> >> >> to compile the test program.
> >> >>
> >> >> Could we add common.h back?
> >> >
> >> > Sorry about that. Should be fixed now!
> >> >
> >>
> >> I'm having trouble with SCOTCH. I get
> >>
> >> Checking for scotch... no (pkg-config file not found)
> >>   Trying to generate pkg-config file for scotch... failed
> >>   *** Unable to generate a suitable pkg-config file for scotch.
> >>   *** If scotch is present on your system, try setting the SCOTCH_DIR
> >>   *** environment variable to the directory where scotch is installed.
> >>   *** SCOTCH_DIR is currently set to /usr/local
> >>
> >> both before and after setting SCOCTH_DIR.
> >
> > I guess you did it without the typo?
> >
> > Anyway, it works for me now.
> >
> > Another suggestion for the build system is to collect things that work
> > and things that didn't work so instead of
> >
> >   Found optional package: petsc
> >   Unable to find optional package: slepc
> >   Found optional package: scotch
> >   Found optional package: umfpack
> >   Found optional package: gts
> >
> > one gets
> >
> >   Found optional package: petsc
> >   Found optional package: scotch
> >   Found optional package: umfpack
> >   Found optional package: gts
> >   Unable to find optional package: slepc
> >
> > Don't know how hard this is to fix. It's not very important but pretty
> > printing is worth quite a bit.
> 
> Should be fixed now!
> 
> Johannes

Very nice! Thanks.

-- 
Anders


References