dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07389
Re: operator() or operator[]
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> 2008/4/11, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:23:15PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > Which one do we want to use for element access in vectors and
> > > > matrices. It looks like operator() is now implemented for uBlasVector,
> > > > but isn't operator[] more natural to use?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Much the same to me. We've used (.,.) for matrices, so it seems natural
> > > to use (.) for vectors.
> > >
> > > Garth
> >
> >
> > We could use [] for matrices also I guess.
> >
> > Then it will look the same as numpy.
>
> It's useful to index vectors with [], since the code will be similar
> for regular arrays.
I forgot something important, namely that operator[] expects exactly
one argument, so we can't do A[i, j] for matrices.
Maybe then it's better to have () both for vectors and matrices?
--
Anders
Follow ups
References