dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ola Skavhaug wrote:
> According to http://developer.kde.org/~wheeler/cpp-pitfalls.html:
>
> Note: While it is not required to use the virtual keyword in our subclass
> implementations (since if the base class implementation is virtual all
> subclass implementations will be virtual) it is still good style to do so.
>
> I don't think DOLFIN does this. 

No, it doesn't.

Should we put adding the virtual keyword to
> virtual methods on the todo-list? After all, the virtual keyword adds
> information to the user.

I'm indifferent.

Garth

> Ola
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev