dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

Kent-Andre Mardal wrote:
> I did not get to test uBlas, but on my machine the assembly process
> (mass matrix) in the attached script took 5.3s with PETSc and 6.1s with
> Epetra. 

I tested with all three back ends, and the differences were very small.

Garth


> Kent
>
>
> ons, 30.04.2008 kl. 09.36 +0100, skrev Garth N. Wells:
> > It looks like the necessary functions for assembly using Trilinos as a 
> > back end are in place, so I was wondering if anyone has had a chance to 
> > compare the assembly performance of the various linear algebra back ends?
> >
> > Garth
> > _______________________________________________
> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev