dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:26:19PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> 2008/6/30 Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> >> The best way to achieve good UFC compatibility is to limit
> >> assumptions about the form compilers to a minimum, and
> >> (a) ufl form
> >> (b) which compiler?
> >> (c) a generic set of compiler options (any kind of object)
> >> sounds to me like a good generalization.
> >
> > Sounds good. We can just have a parameter
> >
> >  form_compiler_options
> >
> > which is passed on to the form compiler in assemble().
> >
> > Should the choice of form compiler be an argument to assemble() or
> > should it be a global option set by dolfin_set()?
> 
> I think that can safely stay a global option, at least for now.
> 
> In particular, mixing form compilers in one application will
> be messy because of dofmaps, and I don't think fixing that
> is where we want to spend our time.

ok.

Hake, do you want to supply a patch for this (a slight modification of
your previous patch). I'm on vacation.

-- 
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature