On Tuesday 01 July 2008 00:27:41 buildbot@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of linux_32.
Full details are available at:
http://fenics.org:8010/dolfin/linux_32/builds/459
Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8010/dolfin/
Buildslave for this Build: x86-linux
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: HEAD
Blamelist: Anders Logg,Johan Hake
BUILD FAILED: failed test
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./demo.py", line 72, in <module>
coefficients = compile_functions(file_string,mesh)
File "/home/buildbot/local/tmp/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dolfin/compile_functions.py",
line 269, in compile_functions
functions = compile_function_code(expressions, mesh)
File "/home/buildbot/local/tmp/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dolfin/compile_functions.py",
line 198, in compile_function_code
(includes, flags, libraries, libdirs) =
instant.header_and_libs_from_pkgconfig("dolfin")
File "/home/buildbot/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/instant.py", line
955, in header_and_libs_from_pkgconfig
raise OSError("The pkg-config file %s does not exist" % pack)
OSError: The pkg-config file dolfin does not exist
So the buildbot complains that it does not have acces to dolfin.pc. Is this
file not installed at the buildbot, or maybe more likely something went wrong
during linking?
Should we remove the demo untill we have come back from vacation and can dig
into this more whole hearted, or is it worth while to have it included?
Johan