dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:35:15AM +0200, Ola Skavhaug wrote:
> Could we add a default constructor to Parameter, e.g., letting it default to
> int or similar? This will make it possible to wrap it with SWIG. The current
> state of SWIG will declare variables like this (depending on where
> Parameter lives in the argument list):
> 
> Parameter arg3;
> 
> This fails due to the lack of default constructor for Parameter. I don't know
> how to get around this silly SWIG behaviour.
> 
> Ola

We could add a default constructor for an int parameter named
"undefined" with value 0 or similar. Parameter is never used directly
by a user anyway (since it will be cast automatically to the
underlying type). 

-- 
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature