dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09016
Re: [Fwd: Re: [HG DOLFIN] merge]
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:31:22PM +0200, kent-and@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Kent-Andre Mardal wrote:
> >> BTW: the Assembler code that computes A, b and enforces BC
> >> simultaneously in a symmetric way,
> >
> > Very nice. We can now implement some symmetric linear solvers.
> >
> > Do you keep the 'Dirichlet' dofs and zero the row and column, or do you
> > eliminate them from the global system?
>
> The Dirichlet dofs are kept. I thought that was simplest to do..
> >
> > is now faster than the standard
> >> non-symmetric way of doing it:
> >>
> >> timings:
> >> new : 1.55
> >> standard: 1.94
> >>
> >
> > Which backend is this using? It could be saying more about the
> > efficiency of the function ident(..), which I suspect is slow for
> > uBlasMatrix, than the assembly process.
> >
>
> Good point. There is speed up for all backends that I have tried.
> Here are the numbers:
>
> ~/local/src/dolfin/demo/pde/sym-dirichlet-bc >python speed-up-test.py |
> grep using
> time for standard assembly 1.89726901054 using uBLAS
> time for new assembly 1.49513792992 using uBLAS
> time for standard assembly 1.97571492195 using PETSc
> time for new assembly 1.55099701881 using PETSc
> time for standard assembly 2.26576018333 using Epetra
> time for new assembly 1.86703896523 using Epetra
>
>
> Kent
Very nice. Is assemble_system fully working now? Can it be safely used
for all forms (in particular DG forms)? If so, we can start using it
in LinearPDE::solve().
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References