dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

Anders Logg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:21:02AM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> > Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:17:13PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > In the FFC-produced wrapper code for DOLFIN, could will still generate a 
> > > > Form constructor which takes the coefficient functions (or a vector of 
> > > > coefficient functions) as an argument? This is needed when one works 
> > > > with a pointer to a form. Doing
> > > >
> > > >    Form* a;
> > > >    a = new WeightedPoissonBilinearForm(V, V);
> > > >
> > > > it's not possible to attach coefficient functions because a Form doesn't 
> > > > know about them, only WeightedPoissonBilinearForm does.
> > > >
> > > > Garth
> > > Is this something that happens in user code (so it needs to look
> > > nice)?
> > >
> > > Otherwise, just do
> > >
> > >   Form* a;
> > >   static_cast<WeightedPoissonBilinearForm*>(a)->f = f;
> > In this case, how and when do you set the FunctionSpace of the form?
> > I don't see a problem in having the old constructor of the type
> >
> > PoissonLinearForm(dolfin::FunctionSpace& V0, dolfin::Function& v0)
> >
> > existing alongside the new approach such that the user can avoid doing too much
> > complicated stuff.
> >
> > Kristian
>
> I agree. I'll add it back again.

Could you take a look at the wrapper code for Functional too while 
you're at it? Presently, two identical constructors are being produced 
by FFC.

Garth

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev