dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:25:37PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:24:37PM +0100, DOLFIN wrote:
> > > One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
> > > A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
> > > 
> > > changeset:   5158:8f5618bc84be42a36517969786370689478b2fe2
> > > tag:         tip
> > > user:        Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > date:        Fri Nov 14 21:24:28 2008 +0100
> > > files:       dolfin/mesh/Mesh.cpp sandbox/misc/main.cpp
> > test/unit/function/cpp/test.cpp test/unit/mesh/cpp/test.cpp
> > > description:
> > > Fix bug in init: only init when needed. Unit tests work again now.
> > 
> > I think we're back on track again. The mesh-ordering/init strategy is
> > worked out (at least I think it looks good), and there is no call to
> > mesh.order() in any of the demos.
> 
> The function
> 
> void PointCell::order(Cell& cell) const
> {
>   error("PointCell::order() not defined.");
> }
> 
> in dolfin/mesh/PointCell.cpp kills the assembly over facet integrals.
> Should it throw an error or should it simply do nothing?

I think it should do nothing.

But why is this not detected when running the demos?

-- 
Anders


> Kristian
> 
> > Two demos are still failing:
> > 
> >   pde/periodic: segmentation fault
> >   pde/sym-dirichlet-bc: assemble_system missing
> > 
> > Is anyone planning to fix assemble_system? I guess I need to look at
> > PeriodicBC.
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature