dolfin team mailing list archive

["Johannes Ring" <johannr@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, January 16, 2009 13:22, Johan Hake wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 13:18:23 Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Fri, January 16, 2009 13:06, Johan Hake wrote:
>> > On Friday 16 January 2009 13:03:20 Johannes Ring wrote:
>> >> On Fri, January 16, 2009 09:08, Kent Andre wrote:
>> >> > On to., 2009-01-15 at 19:05 +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
>> >> >> I don't know, but I noticed these lines:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A_epetra = cpp.down_cast_EpetraMatrix(A).mat()
>> >> >> b_epetra = cpp.down_cast_EpetraVector(b).vec()
>> >> >> x_epetra = cpp.down_cast_EpetraVector(U.vector()).vec()
>> >> >>
>> >> >> you should be able to do just
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A_epetra = down_cast(A).mat()
>> >> >> b_epetra = down_cast(b).vec()
>> >> >> x_epetra = down_cast(U.vector()).vec()
>> >> >>
>> >> >> the type is found in a python layer by introspection.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Martin
>> >> >
>> >> > OK.
>> >> >
>> >> > Trilinos and Dolfin are compiled with different versions of SWIG.
>> >>
>> >> Anyone
>> >>
>> >> > have experience with this? Could this be the problem?
>> >>
>> >> The Trilinos packages at packages.simula.no are now recompiled with
>> SWIG
>> >> 1.3.37. They are only available for Hardy at the moment. Let me know
>> if
>> >> anyone wants me to build Trilinos packages for Intrepid as well.
>> >
>> > If you compile PyDOLFIN with swig 1.3.37, (and that could actually be
>> > nice),
>> > you also have to compiled Trilinos with this version.
>>
>> I haven't touched the DOLFIN packages, only the Trilinos packages has
>> been
>> rebuilt.
>
> Ok, but I suppose you built the hardy DOLFIN with swig 1.3.37?

No, the DOLFIN 0.9.0 packages were built with standard Hardy SWIG (i.e.
version 1.3.33). This was sometimes last week I think, before you made
your changes.

Johannes