← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: [HG DOLFIN] Move code from Function copy constructor to assignment operator and

 

On Monday 16 February 2009 11:31:36 Anders Logg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:12:21AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:36:52AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> > >> On Sunday 15 February 2009 21:23:44 DOLFIN wrote:
> > >>> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
> > >>> A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
> > >>>
> > >>> changeset:   5701:d3661203791d9c7707695c59adbbd3a2e20a220c
> > >>> tag:         tip
> > >>> user:        Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> date:        Sun Feb 15 21:23:36 2009 +0100
> > >>> files:       dolfin/function/Function.cpp
> > >>> description:
> > >>> Move code from Function copy constructor to assignment operator and
> > >>> call assignment operator from copy constructor
> > >>
> > >> I liked Garth solution better.
> > >>
> > >>  1) A copy constructor that, just copies the Function if it has
> > >>     a FunctionSpace.
> > >>  2) The assignment operator works only for discrete Functions.
> > >>
> > >> We could add an interpolate() (or something) function that
> > >>
> > >>   v.interpolate(*_vector, *_function_space);
> > >
> > > We already have exactly such a function.

Do we?

> > >> Then the user can explicitly create a discrete function of its
> > >> user-defined Function. Now the user gets this as an implicitly result
> > >> of a function copy, which make litle sense to me.
> > >>
> > >> But that's just me :)
> > >
> > > I like it. Other opinions?
> >
> > It is neat, but I would prefer any interpolation to be more explicit so
> > that it's clear what's going on. A copy should be a straight copy.
> >
> > Garth
>
> ok. I've changed it back. See if it looks ok.

Now a user cannot copy a Function that is not a discrete function, which was 
the case before we started all this. 

Also sometimes a copy is something different than an assignment, so it is not 
always meaningfull to use *this = other; in the copy constructor.

Johan


Follow ups

References