dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:28:00PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote:
> On Monday 30 March 2009 21:23:49 kent-and@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 04:33:16PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> > >> On Thursday 26 March 2009 21:44:50 Anders Logg wrote:
> > >> > FFC is now fully functional w.r.t. compilation of UFL forms, at least
> > >> > judging by the demos in FFC which now all produce correct results.
> > >> >
> > >> > The Poisson demo in DOLFIN has also been moved to UFL.
> > >>
> > >> Should we also include the ufl version of the Poission python demo too?
> > >>
> > >> This could be done by putting:
> > >>
> > >> from dolfin import *
> > >> try:
> > >>     from dolfin.ufl import *
> > >> except:
> > >>     pass
> > >>
> > >> at the top of the poission demo.
> > >
> > > I don't think it's necessary. It would generally be good if we could
> > > avoid try/except in demos as it obfuscates the code.
> >
> > In the long run I guess
> >   from dolfin import *
> > does the same as
> >   from dolfin.ufl import *
> > does now.
> 
> Of course!
> 
> I will just move all the files from from dolfin.ufl to dolfin and its done. 
> Then we will also remove from 
> 
>   from ffc import *
> 
> that now polute the namespace when also doing an 
> 
>   from dolfin.ufl import *

Well, that's the main point. To make a release now which supports both
FFC (.form) and UFL (.ufl). Then we can freely remove all the FFC
specific stuff.

-- 
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature