← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: [HG DOLFIN] Filter out PETSc argument when parsing command-line parameters.

 

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:14:03PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote:
> On Saturday 05 September 2009 23:40:50 DOLFIN wrote:
> > One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
> > A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
> >
> > changeset:   6950:e685bced17258c83ec9c55badc4ce3adf991c1d8
> > tag:         tip
> > user:        Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > date:        Sat Sep 05 23:40:39 2009 +0200
> > files:       ChangeLog demo/parameters/cpp/main.cpp
> >  dolfin/main/SubSystemsManager.cpp dolfin/main/SubSystemsManager.h
> >  dolfin/parameter/GlobalParameters.cpp dolfin/parameter/GlobalParameters.h
> >  dolfin/parameter/Parameters.cpp dolfin/parameter/Parameters.h description:
> > Filter out PETSc argument when parsing command-line parameters.
> > The following should now work:
> >
> >   ./demo <other options> --petsc.foo bar <other options>
> >
> > provided the program in question parses command-line arguments by
> >
> >   parameters.parse(argc, argv).
> >
> > All arguments starting with "--petsc." will be sent to PETSc. In the
> > above example,
> >
> >   -foo bar
> >
> > will be sent to PETSc. (Note '-' instead of '--'.)
> >
> > Other arguments will be parsed by the parameter set in question.
> >
> > This only happens for the global DOLFIN parameter set (or any other
> > parameter set named "dolfin").
>
> It is a bit fragile to rely on the naming of a particular parameter.
>
> Couldn't the petsc part be implemented in GlobalParameters::parse() instead,
> for example by letting 'parse' be a virtual function?

Yes, good idea. I'll change it when I fix the () / [] issue.

--
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


References