dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #15352
Re: [Dorsal-dev] MUMPS or SPOOLES
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:19:58AM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:15:57AM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >> Anders Logg wrote:
> >>> Which is the preferred parallel direct solver? MUMPS or SPOOLES?
> >>>
> >> Probably depends on the system, but in my experiences MUMPS has been
> >> better. However, the Debian/Ubuntu PETSc packages are configured with
> >> SPOOLES, but not MUMPS.
> >
> > ok, I'm trying out MUMPS now.
> >
> > Harish: Perhaps --download-mumps=yes should be added to petsc.package
> > in Dorsal?
>
> It requires a few more flags than just '--download-mumps=yes' as you'll
> soon see ;).
Yes...
So far, I've added
--with-parmetis=1 --with-parmetis-dir=/usr/include/parmetis --download-mumps=1
But PETSc is complaining about ScaLAPACK. Is it possible to use the
Debian package? I'm using OpenMPI (from Debian) but
libscalapack-mpi-dev seems to require mpich.
Which is the simplest way to get MUMPS running?
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References