dolfin team mailing list archive

[dolfin@xxxxxxxxxx (DOLFIN)]

One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.

changeset:   7064:c40bbecceee472f10fc64a598cf6cbdd4afc413f
tag:         tip
user:        Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
date:        Tue Sep 15 11:01:23 2009 +0200
files:       demo/function/eval/cpp/main.cpp demo/function/eval/python/demo.py
description:
Add not_workin_in_parallel to function evaluation demo. Fails when trying to evaluate
at a point which is not in the local mesh which is natural. Don't know if there's
nice fix.


changeset:   7063:39463579c3b97aa00487a7d2020ea02b679563a9
parent:      7062:015243d40d77bae02ea29bb3a88231c85bc5d4e1
parent:      7061:958c2917b0138be62bae5b8cbf6f35d38e90863b
user:        Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
date:        Tue Sep 15 10:57:22 2009 +0200
files:       
description:
merge


changeset:   7062:015243d40d77bae02ea29bb3a88231c85bc5d4e1
parent:      7060:6f313a641de7b0f25de4e96af84cb299e2939d29
user:        Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
date:        Tue Sep 15 10:55:13 2009 +0200
files:       demo/function/nonmatching-interpolation/python/demo.py dolfin/function/Data.cpp dolfin/function/Data.h dolfin/function/Function.cpp dolfin/function/Function.h dolfin/function/UFCFunction.cpp
description:
Revert optimization to UFCFunction.cpp (not storing _ufc_cell). The problem was
that the cell might originate from another mesh and so was not valid. We could
consider storing the mesh also and check that as well but the Function class is
up for redesign (simplification) anyway so it can wait until then.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more details, visit http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin