← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: Strange assertions in Function constructors

 

On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 12:12:34PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > Why are there two different assertions on the vector size on the
> > Function constructors:
> >
> >   assert(V->dofmap().global_dimension() == x.size());
> >   assert(V->dofmap().global_dimension() <= x->size());
> >
> > Is this a typo? I hope so. Otherwise it's strange that the behavior
> > should be different depending on whether x is a pointer or reference.
> >
>
> They should actually have been '<='. This is to handle sub-function
> 'views' where the sub-function points to the 'mother' vector but has
> it's own function space (the sub-space).

There's still one == there. Should that one also be changed for
consistency?

--
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Follow ups

References