dolfin team mailing list archive

[Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Anders Logg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
>   
> > Anders Logg wrote:
> >     
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:00:18PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> > >       
> > > > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > >         
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 03:26:30PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote:
> > > > >           
> > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The mesh registered in the forms (a and L) is the original mesh from the first
> > > > > > itteration, as it is cached in the form_data. ffc.jit does not recognize when
> > > > > > a mesh is changed.
> > > > > >             
> > > > > This shouldn't matter. The code should be the same when assembling on
> > > > > different meshes. Something else must be going wrong. Don't know what
> > > > > yet.
> > > > >
> > > > >           
> > > > A quick fix might be to not cache the form_data in jit_form?
> > > >         
> > > Then it has to be recomputed which can take some time. What is it in
> > > form_data that changes when we move to a new mesh?
> > >
> > >       
> > original_arguments/coefficients
> >     
>
> I think this should be fixed now. I changed the caching so it caches
> on id(form) instead of form.
>
>   

Looks much better :) I'm happy now.

--
Marie


> Then the new form will get new form data even if it has the same
> __repr__.
>
> --
> Anders
>