dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

Anders Logg wrote:
> This looks a like a non-optimal solution. Are you returning the mesh
> by value? That will lead to creation of a temporary and copying of the
> entire refined mesh.
> 

So they used say ;). Apparently modern compilers are all clever enough
not to.

Garth

> What if we have
> 
>   FooRefinement::refine(old_mesh, new_mesh)
> 
> or similar?
> 
> --
> Anders
> 
> 
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 10:13:15PM -0000, noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> revno: 4461
>> committer: Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>
>> branch nick: dolfin-nompi
>> timestamp: Sun 2010-02-07 21:53:42 +0000
>> message:
>>   Work on mesh refinement interface.
>>
>>   Do not overwrite old mesh inside refinement functions belonging to static classes. Need to keep old mesh to peform update in adapative methods, so previously the mesh had to be copied before calling refine(...).
>> modified:
>