dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <hake.dev@xxxxxxxxx>]

Blueprint changed by Johan Hake:

Whiteboard changed:
  Implications for PyDOLFIN:
  Using std::vectors instead of double* in exchanging data will force us to copy data in the python interface. Sometimes this is OK but sometimes we loose functionality, for example copying Mesh::coordinates does not make sense.
  
  When do we copy Mesh::coordinates into a Vector?
  
  JH: Never(?) I misinterpreted the design suggestion to change all
  argument handling from double * to std::vector. (Mesh::coordinates might
  still be a bad example for this :P)
  
  GNW: I suggest that we use dolfin::Array. This provides safety and a
  simple interface to Python.
+ 
+ Logg: Yes. I think we should just change to Array everywhere. (comment
+ grabbed from email list)
+ 
+ The only problem is it requires some work since we have used std::vector
+ in quite a few places. I count ca 150 occurences of std::vector in the
+ C++ interface.
+ 
+ JH: I agree with Garth. The Blueprint is about using std::vector in the
+ LA interface, not the whole DOLFIN interface. I think that discussion
+ should be taken in the Array typemap blueprint. As pointed out in that
+ blueprint, we have not yet solved the issue when an std::vector (Array)
+ need to be resized. For this situation std::vector suites us quite well
+ at the moment.

-- 
Use std::vector in la interface in place of pointers
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dolfin/+spec/stl-vectors-la