dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #18265
Re: Strangeness in advection-diffusion demo
On Tuesday May 11 2010 06:48:04 Anders Logg wrote:
> The advection-diffusion demo (both C++ and Python versions) says in
> the comment that a stabilized method is used, but the stabilization
> seems to be missing.
Yes, it looks like the stabilization part is missing.
> I think I remember this being added at some point, by either Hake or
> Garth. Any clue where this went?
I have mentioned adding a SUPG stabilized demo a while ago. I do not know who
added this one, eventhough my name comes up on bzr annotate :P. It looks like
it is Kristian who is the original author?
> There also seems to be a typo for the diffusive term which appears in
> both LHS and RHS.
The diffusive term looks correct to me. Note that the advective term is _not_
integrated by part. This implicitly sets a flux condition on the Neumann
boundaries to:
dot(u*velocity,n)
The diffusive flux across the boundaries are set to zero.
Johan
Follow ups
References