dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 15:19 -0700, Johan Hake wrote:
> Works fine here!
> 
> Both cpp and python demos runs!
> 
> After I set the Trilinos_DIR it finds that too. However, it would be nice to 
> be able to set Trilinos_DIR to the directory where trilinos is installed 
> instead of to where it is installed + include. Maybe cmake can look into 
> $Trilinos_DIR/include to find the TrilinosConfig.cmake? 

Strange - I set just $Trilinos_DIR.

I observed some strange behaviour yesterday for SLEPc with the
'include'.

> Otherwise cmake finds all 4 LA backends. 
> 
> The python path in dolfin.conf file is wrong:
> 
> export 
> PYTHONPATH=/home/hake/bzr/fenics/dolfin/local//home/hake/bzr/fenics/dolfin/local/lib/python2.6/site-
> packages:/home/hake/bzr/fenics/dolfin/local//home/hake/bzr/fenics/dolfin/local/lib/python2.6/site-
> packages:$PYTHONPATH
> 

I just pushed a fix.

The Python installation path now comes from distutils, which should be
platform independent.

> This is the configure ouput:
> -- Checking for package 'SCOTCH-PT'
> -- Could NOT find SCOTCH  (missing:  SCOTCH_INCLUDE_DIR SCOTCH_LIBRARIES)
> -- Checking for package 'UMFPACK'
> -- UMF  /usr/include/suitesparse
> -- Checking for package 'MTL4'
> -- PETSc ARCH=
> 
> Is some of the configuring cached? It doesn't tell me that Trlinos or PETSc 
> were found. Scotch is not found even if I set SCOTCH_DIR. Do I have to set 
> both SCOTCH_INCLUDE_DIR SCOTCH_LIBRARIES? 
> 

Just SCOTCH_DIR. Do you have PT-SCOTCH installed? It checks for that.

> What does the notion of PETSc ARCH= mean?
> 

For a while now with PETSc it's been necessary to set PETSC_ARCH (a
PETSc change) unless it's installed in a default location. The SLEPc
test is quick and simple use PETSC_ARCH for now.

Garth

> Johan
> 
> On Friday August 13 2010 06:23:49 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > I've added a 'cmake.local' file to DOLFIN (analogous to 'scons.local')
> > to make building with CMake easy. It would be good if any who is
> > interested could try it out and send feedback. My impression is that
> > partial re-builds are *much* faster with CMake compared to SCons.
> > 
> > Garth
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> > Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp