dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <johan.hake@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday August 23 2010 10:15:32 Anders Logg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:00:48AM -0700, Johan Hake wrote:
> > On Monday August 23 2010 09:50:12 Anders Logg wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:48:02AM -0700, Johan Hake wrote:
> > > > On Monday August 23 2010 09:32:40 Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:25:29AM -0700, Johan Hake wrote:
> > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > CMake works smooth here. Much nicer config messages too. You are
> > > > > > doing a great job getting this up and running!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The only test that wont pass for me now is SLEPc. It complains
> > > > > > about PETSC_ARCH not beeing set or set to empty.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I have installed PETSc and SLEPc using dorsal.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Johan
> > > > > 
> > > > > Which platform are you running?
> > > > 
> > > > Lucid
> > > > 
> > > > > Is PETSC_ARCH set?
> > > > 
> > > > Nope.
> > > > 
> > > > > It's very easy to debug. Just add stuff like
> > > > > 
> > > > >   message("PETSC_ARCH = ${PETSC_ARCH}")
> > > > > 
> > > > > in the file cmake/FindSLEPc.cmake.
> > > > 
> > > > I see that the FindPETSc.cmake includes some logic for when
> > > > PETSC_ARCH is not set. This is lacking in FindSLEPc.cmake, which
> > > > requires PETSC_ARCH to be set.
> > > 
> > > ok, now I see what the problem is. I'll see if I can fix it.
> > > 
> > > The way Dorsal installs PETSc has changed. It now does the PETSc-style
> > > installation = no installation which required PETSC_DIR and PETSC_ARCH
> > > to be set.
> > 
> > Ok, still on old dorsal. I liked that everything is installed in one
> > place skipping the need to PETSC_ARCH.
> 
> Yes, but it turns out that didn't work very well with SLEPc 3.1 so we
> had to change.

Ok? 

I am on SLEPc 3.1 but I had to switch to manual install. All tests compiles 
and runs for SLEPc using:

  make examples

Johan