dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <johan.hake@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday December 1 2010 14:06:59 Anders Logg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:51:01PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote:
> > On Wednesday December 1 2010 11:19:28 noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > revno: 5346
> > > committer: Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > branch nick: dolfin-all
> > > timestamp: Wed 2010-12-01 19:15:42 +0000
> > > 
> > > message:
> > >   Re-working of Function interfaces for removal of Data object.
> > >   
> > >   Nearly all test running, but logic needs to be checked. Problem
> > >   remains
> > > 
> > > with demos that use facet info.
> > > 
> > >   Also need to sort out determning whether or nor a ufc::cell belongs
> > >   to a
> > > 
> > > given mesh. modified:
> > There is a whole bunch of functionality that is lost with not having
> > access to a dolfin::Cell. Should this be added to ufc::cell?
> 
> I assume we will keep all existing functionality in place, in
> particular the functions defined in SpecialFunctions.h.

My point is that in the data argument you could access a dolfin::Cell. This 
you cannot do now. I think this is a no go if we cannot find a substitute for 
the lost functionality.

Johan