dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #20829
Re: [buildbot@xxxxxxxxxx: buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on dolfin-linux64-exp]
-
To:
dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:04:08 +0000
-
In-reply-to:
<20110119182956.GS3206@eowyn>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7
On 19/01/11 18:29, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:26:35AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote:
>> On Wednesday January 19 2011 08:41:39 Anders Logg wrote:
>>> This seems to be related to the introduction of operator() in the C++
>>> interface.
>>>
>>> I'm suspecting that the problem is that one of the virtual eval
>>> functions has been moved up one level from Expression to
>>> GenericFunction. I'll try to fix it but Johan may spot to problem
>>> faster.
>>
>> Is this fixed now? I made an instant clean, or more precise, I errased all
>> dolfin_ in the cache.
>
> I didn't think of running instant-clean. That was probably what fixed
> the problem.
>
> Johannes, is instant-clean being run on the buildbots?
>
It's not. It can be triggered by manually rebuilding instant on the
buildbot.
Garth
>> Everything runs smooth here. But I get a maximum recursion error while running
>> the function unit test:
>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "test.py", line 90, in testOverLoadAndCallBack
>> s0 = norm(interpolate(e0, V))
>> File "/home/hake/local/lib/python2.6/site-
>> packages/dolfin/fem/interpolate.py", line 30, in interpolate
>> Pv.interpolate(v)
>> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object
>
> I will look into it.
>
> --
> Anders
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References