← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: SWIG 2.0.2

 

This should be fixed now. It looked like it only was a bunch of warnings. I 
just suppressed them. 

We might want to eventually make Variable a shared_ptr stored class, which 
will then remove almost all warnings. But then we need to turn all the not 
shared_ptr stored derived classes of Variable into shared_ptr stored classes. 
(Not sure they are that many though...)

I did not have any trouble with the VertexFunction

Johan

On Thursday March 10 2011 08:33:50 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On 10/03/11 15:57, Johan Hake wrote:
> > On Thursday March 10 2011 07:42:13 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >> On 10/03/11 15:40, Johan Hake wrote:
> >>> On Thursday March 10 2011 04:47:13 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>>> The DOLFIN Python interface won't build with SWIG 2.0.2. This issue is
> >>>> that SWIG 2.0.2 demands that if a shared pointer is declared for a
> >>>> class, then all classes in the class hierarchy must be declared as
> >>>> shared pointers.
> >>> 
> >>> This has always been the case. It might be that we previously got away
> >>> with it.
> >>> 
> >>>> I've done this, but there are two sticking points:
> >>>>  - Unit tests fail for MeshFunctions. I expect that this is related to
> >>>> 
> >>>> the SWIG magic that has been implemented for templated MeshFunctions.
> >>> 
> >>> Has something changed for MeshFunctions?
> >> 
> >> I'm digging more, and it seems that VertexFunction is the culprit. The
> >> other named MeshFunctions seem ok.
> >> 
> >>>> - SWIG reports:
> >>>>   Warning 520: Base class 'ufc::function' of 'Foo' is not similarly
> >>>>   marked as a smart pointer.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I don't understand this because I added '%shared_ptr(ufc::function)'
> >>>> to UFC.
> >>> 
> >>> It looks like we need to include
> >>> 
> >>>   %shared_ptr(ufc::function)
> >>> 
> >>> in shared_ptr_classes.i too. We already have:
> >>>   %shared_ptr(ufc::form)
> >> 
> >> I tried that, but have looked in much depth because I got stuck with the
> >> MeshFunctions.
> > 
> > Ok, I need to merge the swig binary stuff before I can have alook. Will
> > do that later today.
> 
> I'll leave it to you - it seems that almost everything breaks
> (MeshFunctions are just the start), so some serious SWIG skill is required.
> 
> Garth
> 
> >>> Johan
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> I will see if a minimal example regenerates the error.
> >>> 
> >>>> The almost working branch is at
> >>>> 
> >>>>     lp:~dolfin-core/dolfin/wells
> >>>> 
> >>>> Garth
> >>>> 
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> >>>> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> >>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> >> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



Follow ups

References