← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: SWIG Version 2.0 for DOLFIN

 

On Monday March 14 2011 05:38:25 Anders Logg wrote:
> B1;2600;0cOn Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:34:19PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Johannes Ring <johannr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> > >> On 14/03/11 09:32, Johannes Ring wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Johan Hake <johan.hake@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> > >>>> Hello!
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> I have now removed all traces of SWIG code for version < 2.0.
> > >>>> Unfortunately I have not been able to test it at my buildbot, as
> > >>>> the versions has diverged, due to a previous merge gone wrong.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Johannes could you make a new branch of dolfin at my buildbot from
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>  lp:~dolfin-core/dolfin/hake
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> and maybe push force build after that?
> > >>> 
> > >>> Done.
> > >> 
> > >> Have all the buildbots been updated to SWIG 2.0?
> > > 
> > > No, I'm working on it. Only mac-osx and linux64-exp have SWIG 2.0 at
> > > the moment.
> > 
> > I have now upgraded SWIG to version 2.0 on the buildbots. The
> > lucid-amd64 and maverick-i386 slaves, building dolfin-main, are using
> > /usr/bin/swig2.0 from the Ubuntu package (backported from Natty),
> > while the personal buildbots are using some locally installed SWIG.
> > 
> > This results in errors like this on dolfin-main:
> >   OSError: PyDOLFIN was not compiled with the present version of swig.
> >   Install swig version 2.0.01 or recompiled PyDOLFIN with present swig
> 
>                                            ~~~
> 
> Don't know how to fix but there's a typo in there.

He, he, do not think this is the cause of the problem. 

> --
> Anders
> 
> > How are we supposed to deal with this? I have used
> > -DSWIG_EXECUTABLE:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/swig2.0 when building UFC and
> > DOLFIN but how can this executable be specified when running the
> > tests?

This is done by setting:

  parameters["swig_binary"] = "swig2.0"

I addressed this problem a while ago. Not sure how to "fix" this. Either by 
setting a global parameters.xml file, if this is possible, or patch 
globalparameters.py where the parameter is added.

Johan
 
> > Johannes
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> > Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



Follow ups

References