dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #23767
VariationalProblem interface
-
To:
DOLFIN Mailing List <dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:54:06 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<67102A6A-375C-4EC0-AA8C-76DA9B8FC82D@simula.no>
-
User-agent:
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> I'm on a cell phone and can't engage in any discussions but I just
> want to throw something in. Marie and I discussed at some point
> another option which is to write everything as F = 0 and let UFL
> compute J even for linear problems. J would be a optional
> variable. Then we could have a common interface and also a common
> solver.
Any further thoughts on this? It's important we get this right.
I can live with
LinearVariationalProblem
NonlinearVariationalProblem
if everyone else thinks that's the best option, but don't really like
it since it's very long. Another option (if we don't go for the F = 0
option) is
VariationalProblem
NonlinearVariationalProblem
--
Anders
Follow ups