dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 06:14:27PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 06:09:24PM +0200, Kent-Andre Mardal wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 20 September 2011 15:30, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >      On 20 September 2011 13:50, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >      > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs
> >      wrote:
> >      >> On 19 September 2011 16:07, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >      >> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:51:27PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >      >> >> On 19 September 2011 14:08, Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
> >      wrote:
> >      >> >> > On 09/19/11 14:28, Anders Logg wrote:
> >      >> >> >>
> >      >> >> >> Is it time to make a release of 1.0-beta2? Remaining bugs
> >      and
> >      >> >> >> blueprints can be moved to rc1.
> >      >> >> >
> >      >> >> > I rather propose that the next release is indeed rc1, and
> >      that that is
> >      >> >> > released when the blueprints and bugs tagged by
> >      &quot;Essential&quot; or &quot;Critical&quot;
> >      >> >> > are fixed.
> >      >> >> >
> >      >> >>
> >      >> >> We've made a lot of fixes, so I think that a beta-2 is a good
> >      idea to
> >      >> >> get some more testing.
> >      >> >
> >      >> > I don't really care that much, but I think the
> >      &quot;proper&quot; thing to do
> >      >> > would be to make betaX releases until we have implemented all
> >      >> > blueprints. Then we make rcX releases until we have fixed all
> >      bugs
> >      >> > (and don't introduce new features until 1.0 is released).
> >      >>
> >      >> +1 :)
> >      >
> >      > I think we should either release beta2 now, or wait with a release
> >      > until we think rc1 is ready, but I don't really care which.
> >      >
> >      > But we should not release rc1 now, since there are plenty of
> >      > blueprints left to fix.
> >      >
> >
> >      I suggest that we release beta-2 as soon as reading mesh functions is
> >      supported in parallel. That will permit a lot more  parallel testing
> >      to be done.
> >
> >      Garth
> >
> > I also vote for a release.
>
> ok, then I think we should make one so we get more testing. Kent is a
> good test object. :-)
>
> Should it be 1.0-beta2 or 1.0-beta-2. I think 1.0-beta2.

lp updated for 1.0-beta2 and 1.0-rc1:

  https://launchpad.net/dolfin/+milestone/1.0-beta2
  https://launchpad.net/dolfin/+milestone/1.0-rc1

--
Anders