dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #24635
Re: SystemAssembler
-
To:
"Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:49:17 +0200
-
Cc:
DOLFIN Mailing List <dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
In-reply-to:
<CAA4C66NX=d-KT-WCSBs7Fmpv0D2uG1gmJP=M0ExHkqaUVvzyNQ@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 04:17:01PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On 4 October 2011 12:24, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > SystemAssembler does not support subdomains. It is even silently
> > ignoring all other integrals than number 0.
> >
> > This is one of the remaining bugs for 1.0-beta2. I can try to fix it
> > but would like some input on what shape the SystemAssembler is
> > currently in. I haven't touched it that much before since it looks
> > like a bit of code duplication to me. In particular, is it necessary
> > to keep both functions cell_wise_assembly and facet_wise_assembly?
> >
>
> It would require some performance testing to decide. I expect that,
> for performance reasons, both are required.
I talked to Kent and cell-wise is much faster before (at least it used
to be), but it does not handle interior facet integrals so both seem
to be required. I'll run a quick test to check.
--
Anders
References