dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #24638
Re: SystemAssembler
-
To:
"Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:35:23 +0200
-
Cc:
DOLFIN Mailing List <dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
In-reply-to:
<CAA4C66NX=d-KT-WCSBs7Fmpv0D2uG1gmJP=M0ExHkqaUVvzyNQ@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 04:17:01PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On 4 October 2011 12:24, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > SystemAssembler does not support subdomains. It is even silently
> > ignoring all other integrals than number 0.
> >
> > This is one of the remaining bugs for 1.0-beta2. I can try to fix it
> > but would like some input on what shape the SystemAssembler is
> > currently in. I haven't touched it that much before since it looks
> > like a bit of code duplication to me. In particular, is it necessary
> > to keep both functions cell_wise_assembly and facet_wise_assembly?
> >
>
> It would require some performance testing to decide. I expect that,
> for performance reasons, both are required.
I'm not getting the Launchpad mails but Marie is telling me it works
fine for her. Perhaps I broke something when I fixed a couple of bugs
today.
Here's the test script I'm running:
from dolfin import *
mesh = UnitCube(32, 32, 32)
V = FunctionSpace(mesh, "Lagrange", 1)
u = TrialFunction(V)
v = TestFunction(V)
a = dot(grad(u), grad(v))*dx
L = v*dx
tic()
assemble(a)
assemble(L)
toc()
print "Regular assembler:", toc()
tic()
assemble_system(a, L)
toc()
print "System assembler:", toc()
--
Anders
Follow ups
References