dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 05:16:29PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:31:51PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >> On 17 November 2011 13:49, Andre Massing <massing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> > Hash: SHA1
> >> >
> >> > On 11/17/2011 02:17 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> >> >> Looks like someone forgot to run the tests before pushing to
> >> >> 1.0.x.
> >> >>
> >>
> >> Test were run.
> >>
> >> >> I just wanted to point this out since it wasn't me this time. :-P
> >> >
> >> > Actually, the change in the GlobalAssemble call in EpetraMatrix is the
> >> > culprit, it says:
> >> >
> >> > [ 61%] Building CXX object
> >> > dolfin/CMakeFiles/dolfin.dir/la/EpetraFactory.cpp.o
> >> > /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics-src/dolfin/dolfin/la/EpetraMatrix.cpp:
> >> > In member function 'virtual void
> >> > dolfin::EpetraMatrix::apply(std::string)':
> >> > /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics-src/dolfin/dolfin/la/EpetraMatrix.cpp:404:
> >> > error: no matching function for call to
> >> > 'Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(bool, Epetra_CombineMode)'
> >> > /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/local/include/trilinos/Epetra_FECrsMatrix.h:527:
> >> > note: candidates are: int Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(bool)
> >> > /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/local/include/trilinos/Epetra_FECrsMatrix.h:554:
> >> > note:                 int Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(const
> >> > Epetra_Map&, const Epetra_Map&, bool)
> >> >
> >> > Is there an older trilinos version installed on the buildbot (which
> >> > one and which version do we require at least?)
> >> >
> >>
> >> The Ubuntu Trilinos package is old (10.4). It is a modified  version,
> >> because the 10.4 source fails to compile with gcc 4.6.
> >>
> >> There is a nasty change in the Epetra interface - the old code still
> >> compiled, but thanks to an interface change the code did something
> >> different.
> >>
> >> I would prefer to support just the latest (10.8). Is there demand for
> >> 10.4? I wouldn't advocate using any of the Ubuntu/Debian linear
> >> algebra packages (Trilinos/PETSc/BLAS) for performance.
> >
> > Supporting only 10.8 sounds fine to me. Less worries for us and those
> > using Trilinos will probably know how to build it.
>
> The Debian packages will then be built without Trilinos support
> (unless someone package 10.8 for Debian).

Sounds ok to me.

--
Anders