← Back to team overview

dolfin team mailing list archive

Re: RFC: remove (container.size() == 0) idiom

 

On 1 March 2012 08:22, Marco Morandini <morandini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are some occurrences of
>
> container.size() == 0
>
> scattered throughout the code
> (and fewer of container.size() != 0) .
> Many of them are harmless, i.e. whenever container
> is a vector. Some of them, however,
> are for maps of sets (e.g. dolfin/adaptivity/Extrapolation.cpp:149 ),
> leading to completely unnecessary O(N) operations (racall that size() is
> O(N) for a map or a list).
>

Thanks for pointing this out.

> I'd like to prepare a (mostly mechanical) patch that changes them into
> container.empty() .
>
> Would be acceptable to change all of them (I'd like to go for this route) or
> should I change only the places where container is not a vector?
>

For consistency, I suggest using empty() everywhere. I'd be happy for
you to make the changes and push a branch to Launchpad.

Garth

> Thanks,
>
> Marco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Follow ups

References