dolfin team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: [Branch ~syfi-core/fenics-syfi/main] Rev 561: Use instant.get_status_output instead of commands.getstatusoutput.]

To: Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Johan Hake <hake.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:30:17 +0200
Cc: DOLFIN Mailing List <dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20120525071457.GI10057@glaurung>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1

I actually think this is a small and handy command each package that useit should define them self. I do not feel strongly about it though, as Isee the benefit of sharing code.


Johan

On 05/25/2012 09:14 AM, Anders Logg wrote:

There is also dolfin_utils.commands.getstatusoutput. Is it the same?
Do we need two replacements for getstatusoutput?

--
Anders



_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Follow ups

Re: [noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: [Branch ~syfi-core/fenics-syfi/main] Rev 561: Use instant.get_status_output instead of commands.getstatusoutput.]
From: Anders Logg, 2012-05-25

References

[noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: [Branch ~syfi-core/fenics-syfi/main] Rev 561: Use instant.get_status_output instead of commands.getstatusoutput.]
From: Anders Logg, 2012-05-25